Lifelesspeople.com

 Forum FAQsForum FAQs  KnowledgebaseKnowledgebase  RulesRules   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   HostingHosting   RegisterRegister 
 DonateDonate   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Adblock - Good or Bad?  Share
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Lifelesspeople.com Forum Index -> Techy Turf
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mcwkm
Lifeless Person


Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 748
Location: ct

PostPosted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 12:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LP-Trel wrote:
I can see both sides of the arguement and I typically side with the visitors. Many websites have started to push advertising in a way that makes some websites nearly unusable for various reasons. The biggest offender in my opinion would be websites that use Adobe Flash based advertising. I hate that. Smile

It's the best when you visit the site and it's not Flash based and you don't have flash installed but you get the popup to install flash for an advertisement.
Back to top
 
LP-Trel
Zen


Joined: 02 Dec 2002
Posts: 5966
Location: Nirvana by Boredom

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eh, I just installed flashblock. NoScript also did the job, but annoyed me a bit too much.
_________________
What would you like to see at L2P? We want your suggestions!
Need Help? Technical SupportKnowledgebaseFlash DemosSignup Questions
Back to top
 
spock
Lifeless Person


Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 3133
Location: The Netherlands

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ClickFanatic wrote:
Well, the problem is: many sites are doing it correctly (using ads in an unobtrusive way), but there are some sites that swamp their visitors with flashing banners and/or popups.
As a visitor, you want to arm yourself effectively against these websites, because they ruin your web experience (quite severely, sometimes). AdBlock Plus is one of the most effective tools, but unfortunately for the 'good' webmasters it blocks all ads.

I completely agree.

And that's actually why I uninstalled AdBlock. To make sure 'good' webmasters get the revenue they deserve. (And I just try to avoid visiting sites with a lot of intrusive ads. )
_________________
My new site
Back to top
 
LP-SolidRaven
Evil Belgian Waffle


Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 8144
Location: Belgium

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 4:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I simply turn it on for the sites where the advertisements cause annoying side effects.
_________________
Dilly dally, shilly shally.
Back to top
 
LP-Trel
Zen


Joined: 02 Dec 2002
Posts: 5966
Location: Nirvana by Boredom

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

spock wrote:
ClickFanatic wrote:
Well, the problem is: many sites are doing it correctly (using ads in an unobtrusive way), but there are some sites that swamp their visitors with flashing banners and/or popups.
As a visitor, you want to arm yourself effectively against these websites, because they ruin your web experience (quite severely, sometimes). AdBlock Plus is one of the most effective tools, but unfortunately for the 'good' webmasters it blocks all ads.

I completely agree.

And that's actually why I uninstalled AdBlock. To make sure 'good' webmasters get the revenue they deserve. (And I just try to avoid visiting sites with a lot of intrusive ads. )


You can actually disable adblock for certain websites with just a few clicks.
_________________
What would you like to see at L2P? We want your suggestions!
Need Help? Technical SupportKnowledgebaseFlash DemosSignup Questions
Back to top
 
spock
Lifeless Person


Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 3133
Location: The Netherlands

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 8:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LP-Trel wrote:

You can actually disable adblock for certain websites with just a few clicks.

True, but you don't know which sites have 'good' webmasters. And I like to give people a chance toshow they've done it right Silly
_________________
My new site
Back to top
 
ClickFanatic
Est. 2005


Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 4685
Location: 37°45'18.24"N 14°59'42.9"E

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I completely forgot, thanks for pointing that out. *disabled ABP for some sites*
_________________
If you can read this, my post is on an alternating background.
Back to top
 
mcwkm
Lifeless Person


Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 748
Location: ct

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 1:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LP-Trel wrote:
spock wrote:
ClickFanatic wrote:
Well, the problem is: many sites are doing it correctly (using ads in an unobtrusive way), but there are some sites that swamp their visitors with flashing banners and/or popups.
As a visitor, you want to arm yourself effectively against these websites, because they ruin your web experience (quite severely, sometimes). AdBlock Plus is one of the most effective tools, but unfortunately for the 'good' webmasters it blocks all ads.

I completely agree.

And that's actually why I uninstalled AdBlock. To make sure 'good' webmasters get the revenue they deserve. (And I just try to avoid visiting sites with a lot of intrusive ads. )


You can actually disable adblock for certain websites with just a few clicks.

This doesn't work when you are visiting new sites seeing how the advertisements will have to load once for you to know that it contains bad web advertising.
Back to top
 
ClickFanatic
Est. 2005


Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 4685
Location: 37°45'18.24"N 14°59'42.9"E

PostPosted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mcwkm wrote:
This doesn't work when you are visiting new sites seeing how the advertisements will have to load once for you to know that it contains bad web advertising.

Well, since most of the ads on the web are contextual I do enable them for some sites because the advertisement may actually contain something that I find relevant. Weblogs about web development or design that I regularly visit are a good example, in my case.
Usually, you can also judge by the looks of a website whether it will have annoying ads or not (the more design-conscious websites usually have nicer, less obtrusive ads).
_________________
If you can read this, my post is on an alternating background.
Back to top
 
Rashy
Lifeless Person


Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 797


PostPosted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Personally I find that even "contextual" ads aren't very useful. As in, I don't think I would find a contextual ad more appealing to click than an non-contextual one. Now I am sure that the data Google collects on this would beg to differ for the majority of people.

I think that the world over needs to evaluate exactly what exactly they should advertise, especially depending on the medium. For example, try and find something that will genuinely interest the viewer of the ads.

For example, if visiting SmashingMagazine I wouldn't be the slightest bit interested in hiring somebody to do "PSD to HTML" for me, but an ad that would catch my interest is something that says "10 Helpful Tricks to Convert Designs to Code" which would lead to said article, and in/alongside that article it would say "Need a little help? We could do this for you!"

See what I mean? Better advertising by inviting the viewer to something free, but sell them your service through that free product.

A different medium: TV. Some national grocery store puts an ad on any station saying something like "Flip to the food channel food channel for Amazing Cooking Show!" and then for the ad breaks of that cooking show you advertise ingredients/products that could make whatever food they are cooking on the show.

By the way, I should patent this idea or something like that.
_________________
Rashy!
Back to top
 
Kesava
Master Poster


Joined: 08 Dec 2009
Posts: 190
Location: India

PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I use Adblock Plus and think that it is great. I do however disable it on certain websites such as this one because revenue is generated though the ads.

It is definiately the first extension I install when I setup Firefox.
Back to top
 
spock
Lifeless Person


Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 3133
Location: The Netherlands

PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I really hate those annoying flash ads that 'jump out of their box' and basically cover the whole website. I see those more and more the last few months.
_________________
My new site
Back to top
 
krt
...


Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 4995
Location: Down Under

PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's good for me as I never click ads. I often am at a browser without any ad blocking software and I only get annoyed. I've learned not to trust almost every ad, even Google sponsored links and ads, and the only time I do is by accident, i.e. when I am quickly downloading an obscure program and an advertisement decides to have a "download now" graphic many times more prominent than the actual site's download button.

The only use for me to not use Adblock is to waste competitors' advertising credits by clicking on their links!

spock wrote:
I really hate those annoying flash ads that 'jump out of their box' and basically cover the whole website. I see those more and more the last few months.

That and full page ads with a "skip" link and/or timer.
_________________
AU Proud
Back to top
 
ClickFanatic
Est. 2005


Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 4685
Location: 37°45'18.24"N 14°59'42.9"E

PostPosted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

krt wrote:
the only time I do is by accident

Same here. I sometimes click the ad several times repeatedly after I clicked it by accident, just to confuse the advertiser and maybe generate some income for the site even though I am completely not interested in the advertised product. It could be seen as click-fraud, though.
Maybe I'm just crazy... but it feels like I am literally making them pay for their stupid ad. Silly
_________________
If you can read this, my post is on an alternating background.
Back to top
 
Jacky
3.14159265358979323846264


Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Posts: 4175


PostPosted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ClickFanatic wrote:
krt wrote:
the only time I do is by accident

Same here. I sometimes click the ad several times repeatedly after I clicked it by accident, just to confuse the advertiser and maybe generate some income for the site even though I am completely not interested in the advertised product. It could be seen as click-fraud, though.
Maybe I'm just crazy... but it feels like I am literally making them pay for their stupid ad. Silly
There are times when I hate an ad for irritating me.

Your suggestion is great.
_________________
ClickFanatic wrote:
Your nonsense make my forum visits rather brief, Jacky. It's like:
"Hey look, a reply notification!"
*click* *click*
*reading garbage*
"Oh it was Jacky again..."
*close*
Back to top
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Lifelesspeople.com Forum Index -> Techy Turf All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Home | Hosting | News | Forum | Links | System Status | About | Archive | Donate ]
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Posts and comments are owned by the poster. Everything else © 2001 - 2007 Lifelesspeople.com