| Author |
Message |
spock
Lifeless Person
Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 3120
Location: The Netherlands
|
 Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 2:54 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| krt wrote: |
though simple things such as setting up profiles for each network, e.g. use this proxy and this static IP config on this network, and use another on another network, are still on the wishlist. |
Google netsh. It's a command-line program supplied with windows that enables you to do that (you can dump your network configuration to a file and restore it from a file, if you write a small batch script you could automate it)
_________________
My new site |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
krt
...
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 4977
Location: Down Under
|
| Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've used it in the past but not for what I want to do, my thinking is that it would clash with the GUI method of network configuration, although I suppose that isn't completely necessary.
Actually, I take that back, thanks Scott! (I've already found that using the CLI is not that bad and beats the number of clicks required to get to the relevant pages through the graphical interface.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Xtreme $niper
Lifeless Person
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1766
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I too have been sitting on my beta disk image and key without having any time (or will, or system) to install it.
So I guess I can just skip the beta and install the RC with my beta key, right?
I'll try it out some day, but I really want to just try it natively instead of in virtualization so I can really get the sense of what they are truly trying to do here... With virtualization you might miss out on some fancy pants features (yeah, I'm a sucker for transparency).
_________________
Come visit Shattered Abstracts! (Photoblog!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Myst
Lifeless Person
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 1008
Location: Somewhere else
|
| Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Xtreme $niper wrote: | | I too have been sitting on my beta disk image and key without having any time (or will, or system) to install it. |
Me too. I'm thinking of grabbing a computer in the next couple of weeks though, and I may install Windows 7 on it to start with, and see how I like it. If I don't, I can grab a cheap copy of Vista Ultimate (woo for being a student) and chuck that on instead  |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Scott
tutorialtoday.com
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 2747
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
|
| Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is it possible to install it from Linux without a DVD drive or a USB key? I have KDE4 on my other computer and I'm not a big fan so I want to change it.
_________________
TutorialToday |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Xtreme $niper
Lifeless Person
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1766
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can't install it from within Linux.. You'd have to use some sort of boot media. You don't have a DVD drive?
_________________
Come visit Shattered Abstracts! (Photoblog!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
LP-SolidRaven
Evil Belgian Waffle
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 7983
Location: Belgium
|
| Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 1:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's possible Scott, but not that easy and I can't advise it. But you could use virtualisation software to run the setup and mount a disk partition as virtual harddrive. Then you'd have to prevent it from trying to write a MBR (or immediately delete it) and setup GRUB or lilo to load vista.
_________________
Dilly dally, shilly shally. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
mcwkm
Lifeless Person
Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 732
Location: ct
|
| Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Scott wrote: | | Is it possible to install it from Linux without a DVD drive or a USB key? I have KDE4 on my other computer and I'm not a big fan so I want to change it. |
If KDE4 is installed on a Linux partition and you are content with the Distribution you could just install a new desktop environment and remove KDE. I would not recommend this as a bunch of unneeded packages will probably remain installed and take up disk space. Although you could just install another desktop environment in addition to KDE from repositories and choose which session at the login manager.
_________________
http://mydorksite.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Gravity14
Novice Poster
Joined: 20 May 2009
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ill probably wait for the official release... |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Xtreme $niper
Lifeless Person
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1766
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I installed it on VMware Fusion on my mac. It's nice to play around with, but I instantly noticed that it really and truly was Vista. At least they've taken it and fixed it up. I still firmly believe that they should offer Windows 7 for free as an upgrade for current legitimate Vista users. I just don't see it being worth the cost for an upgrade if you've already spent it on Vista. This is like punishing your user base for a mistake you, as a software company, made.
_________________
Come visit Shattered Abstracts! (Photoblog!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Elisdee
Novice Poster
Joined: 07 Aug 2009
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Since this thread has died, let's shock it back to life.
The RTM version is released, has anyone toyed with it yet? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
The Grinch
Lifeless Person
Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 6305
Location: Chuck Norris's nightmares.
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Elisdee wrote: | Since this thread has died, let's shock it back to life.
The RTM version is released, has anyone toyed with it yet? |
i've been using the final version ever since it was released to technet/msdn.
I love it.
I dont use the superbar though, i never can tell who is sending me messages on my im programs and such with it (unless i hover over the buttons and it shows me the thumbnails). meh
anyways
I posted a screenshot of my set up here
http://www.lifelesspeople.com/.....388#527388
_________________
http://www.JoshX.com -- my personal site
http://www.damnidunno.com -- i dunno |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Xtreme $niper
Lifeless Person
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1766
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Grinch wrote: | | Elisdee wrote: | Since this thread has died, let's shock it back to life.
The RTM version is released, has anyone toyed with it yet? |
i've been using the final version ever since it was released to technet/msdn.
I love it.
I dont use the superbar though, i never can tell who is sending me messages on my im programs and such with it (unless i hover over the buttons and it shows me the thumbnails). meh
anyways
I posted a screenshot of my set up here
http://www.lifelesspeople.com/.....388#527388 |
Cool, I didn't know you could turn off the new bar style.
I always find it amusing when I see Windows users with some sort of Dock program like OS X that almost always misses the point about what the Dock is actually useful for, aside from being a launcher. =P
_________________
Come visit Shattered Abstracts! (Photoblog!) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
The Grinch
Lifeless Person
Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 6305
Location: Chuck Norris's nightmares.
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Xtreme $niper wrote: | | The Grinch wrote: | | Elisdee wrote: | Since this thread has died, let's shock it back to life.
The RTM version is released, has anyone toyed with it yet? |
i've been using the final version ever since it was released to technet/msdn.
I love it.
I dont use the superbar though, i never can tell who is sending me messages on my im programs and such with it (unless i hover over the buttons and it shows me the thumbnails). meh
anyways
I posted a screenshot of my set up here
http://www.lifelesspeople.com/.....388#527388 |
Cool, I didn't know you could turn off the new bar style.
I always find it amusing when I see Windows users with some sort of Dock program like OS X that almost always misses the point about what the Dock is actually useful for, aside from being a launcher. =P |
Thats pretty much what the dock is... a launcher.
For me its much quicker than icons on the desktop, or on the start menu, because all i do is hover my mouse at the bottom of the screen and it pops up and i click what i need. Much better than clicking and clicking and clicking. Much cooler and cleaner than desktop icons a well.
The new taskbar doesnt work well for me because i never really know whats going on inside of the button. Like who just sent me a message, etc. I'd much rather have all that laid out so i can see it before i even click.
_________________
http://www.JoshX.com -- my personal site
http://www.damnidunno.com -- i dunno |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
krt
...
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 4977
Location: Down Under
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Really? All I think of docks is they are a waste of space. I quite like the OSX theme except the dock, especially as you either have to use auto hide which I never liked or have the dock always on with the bottom left and right corners being dead space, and on a widescreen, this is significant wasted space. The time I spend opening programs is negligible so I'll take one extra click any day (Start > one of the most common programs) or at worst, Start > type a few letters > enter.
And I agree about the Windows 7 taskbar, it took me roughly half an hour to revert to the traditional icon and text buttons. My main gripes were lack of easily visible information and it was annoying to select the window you wanted when there were multiple instances running (despite knowing about window previews and middle click to cycle through the instances).
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
|
|
Forum FAQs 
Knowledgebase 
Memberlist 
Usergroups 
Hosting
Register
Donate 
Profile 
Log in 
