| Author |
Message |
kenoodo
Lifeless Person
Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 1092
Location: MengDai
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:30 am Post subject: |
 |
|
I am still running IE6. Tried times of IE7, felt nothing was so special, so, after times of system reghost. IE6 is here and I have no thing to complain.
Not sure if it needed to install IE8. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
mcwkm
Grandmaster Poster
Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 323
Location: ct
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kenoodo wrote: | I am still running IE6. Tried times of IE7, felt nothing was so special, so, after times of system reghost. IE6 is here and I have no thing to complain.
Not sure if it needed to install IE8. |
please say you are not using that as your main browser |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
krt
...
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 4745
Location: Down Under
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe he really is!
I cannot imagine how you can use that kenoodo. As someone who seems to use the Internet a fair bit judging by the fact that you are on a forum for a web hosting site and posting somewhat regularly, I don't know why you make things so painful. Don't you get sick of multiple windows, IE6's susceptibility to crashing and rendering issues now that people are starting to neglect IE6?
If you are just looking for something lightweight instead of IE7, at least use something fast and solid, heck, even Safari might be a better option (although the Windows version wasn't very good last time I checked - but it was in beta then). |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
pjthefarmer
Master Poster
Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 237
Location: Building the worlds largest Mini Chef
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I want to get IE8 but my OS (Vista SP1 Evaluation Version) won't support it and I can't find an update to get the official SP1 so I will have to stick to IE7 (even though I rarely use it).
_________________
[img:2b23f8c1d9]http://i15.tinypic.com/6fq09pl.jpg[/img:2b23f8c1d9] |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Jacky
intel inside
Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Posts: 3835
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
So far I haven't even tried IE7, let alone IE8.
I am still on the "classic" IE6. It's just installed so that if I need it I can use it.
I'm using Firefox as my main browser.
_________________
3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816406286208998628034825342
11706798214808651328230664709384460955058223172535940812848111745028410270193852110555964462294
89549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456485669234603486104543266482133
9360726024 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
kutar
Mini Game Hunter
Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 1371
Location: Techno Island
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jacky wrote: | So far I haven't even tried IE7, let alone IE8.
I am still on the "classic" IE6. It's just installed so that if I need it I can use it.
I'm using Firefox as my main browser. |
Firefox is good.
But I never suggest people try IE beta as IE is tighted with OS too close and shared by many application, so some is stick in complete trouble:
http://blogs.computerworld.com....._my_system
And the way that they dealing with old website is not good. The default standard mode not only violate the browser de facto practice (incorrect DTD will run quirks), but also causing inconvenience: How come I can get a 1999 homepage , which admin lose this control to the page / forget the page to update?
Asking stoneage man using computer is impossible.
_________________
Sleepless Cat‧The one looking for her path... |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
|
|
Forum FAQs 
Knowledge Base 
Memberlist 
Usergroups 
Hosting
Register
Donate 
Profile 
Log in 
