Lifelesspeople.com

 Forum FAQsForum FAQs  Knowledge BaseKnowledge Base  RulesRules   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   HostingHosting   RegisterRegister 
 DonateDonate   WikiWiki   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Looking for opinion on our online site builder
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Lifelesspeople.com Forum Index -> Community Feedback, Suggestions, and Comments
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
LP-Trel
Zen


Joined: 02 Dec 2002
Posts: 5730
Location: Nirvana by Boredom

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 4:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I see that Michael is already here. Sneaky one he is. Wink

I see they weren't too hard on you although they can be a rough bunch sometimes.
_________________
* Knowledge Base * Wiki * Forum FAQs *
Back to top
 
LP-Shirl
Live for Passion


Joined: 07 Aug 2004
Posts: 5786
Location: U.S. Delaware

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 4:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Goodness it's been al while since I first posted here. o_0 After some thinking I've decided that a page builder would help out quite a bit. If someone has little or no knowledge or any type of coding, they can see the coding after they design their pages with the site builder so it makes more sense to them.
_________________
"You Cant Keep Going to the Chicken Coop with Blah Blah on Your Mind When All You Have is Hot Sauce in Your Glove Compartment."
Back to top
 
SoulJah
D!sCIpl3 0F C|-|2!5t


Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 1977
Location: In God's Majestic Kingdom

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 7:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just out of curiousity, besides php what other languages and scripts are supported in it? I haven't tried it out yet but if thisWYSIWYG editor is going to move on maybe supporting more languages can help a lot. Smile
_________________
Living by Faith

Romans 1:16- I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile

[img:bab3761c17]http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/9948/6011512295956ju.png[/img:bab3761c17]
[img:bab3761c17]http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/8500/archangelsig019kn.jpg[/img:bab3761c17]
Back to top
 
Voldemort
Unhandled Exception


Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 948
Location: In a Galaxy far, far away

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 8:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DUH! Shocked This one is impressive! Trampoline

Nice clean Ajax, very easy to use! However, I would suggest making the user capable of editing the text content boxes on the fly, without the need of a new dumb reload. Just like vBulletin's and IPB's new quick post edit! Wink

Moreover, you definitely need a resize tool... Confused
_________________
It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas
Everywhere you go;
Take a look in the five and ten glistening once again
With candy canes and silver lanes aglow..

(It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas)
Back to top
 
packagedeliverer
Pro Freelancer::llp elder


Joined: 20 Feb 2004
Posts: 2692
Location: belgium

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LP-Trel wrote:
I see they weren't too hard on you although they can be a rough bunch sometimes.

Then I guess I'll be the first.

Ok, I've watched the video and I think it might be better for you to use text to explain the concept. The quality of the audio isn't optimal and the pronunciation of the english is weird at times and thus hard to understand for people who only have a basic knowledge of english. Maybe some slides might be a better solution (like the video tutorial), that way a user may advance on his/her own tempo. Also, I saw you were having trouble selecting the full content of the textbox, it doesn't really give a good impression.
(Tiny mce you're using?)
At the moment of typing the "try the demo" button isn't working, so I eventually found my way to the demo by the login link you posted here and using "demo" as password and username (not iwdn or 12345).
You should really work on the design of the controle panel. The eye has it's needs aswell; people need to think they can create at least the same they see before them. As it is, expectations wouldn't be high enough.
The video tutorial starts with a pure red font and blue background. www.colormatch.dk is something I like to use for finding matching colors, suggest you try that. (or google: 'colormatch 5k' / 'colormatch 10k').
Some further nitpicking on the design: the main site of "page builder basics" has no backgroundcolor while the rest of the site has.
The resolution of the video tutorial is too small to see some of the buttons below (play/forward/back/about/...).
The page info icon resembles the alignation button of ms office, which is confusing; I suggest you'd use a traditional icon. Stick to things people know.
When adding things, it is required to enter a layer name. If people who are not familiar with div or layer positioning, html or any other language, why should they care how the layer is called?

The concept reminds me of the pagebuilder yahoo geocities has. But that is a java application instead of a ajax-web application. You should take the time to have a look at that. Very easy to use. Many have found it to be very easy to use. "Why" would be the next question. Let's compare.
- The pagebuilder has a familiar navigation, looks like one of the many programs we use (at least for windows users, the os most pc-noobs have)
- The main window always stays in sight, so users can't forget what they were doing again (and let me assure you, people will have to click the back button at your site builder to see what they needed to add again (be it link or image)) .
- It is plain, simple, what we're used to. Needs no further explanation.

The only limitation which bothered me is that you couldn't drag element over other elements. It was tables only.

Another suggestion: For the synchronization: with that many files to transfer, it isn't clear what file should be uploaded and which should not. Maybe some thumbnails? Maybe some subcategories or site tree?


However advanced the technology might be, when it doesn't feel right to work with, it's doomed to fail (not to discourage you, you just need to improve the gui).
What I've seen so far still doesn't convince me to prefer the site builder over other cms's or wysiwyg-editors such as dreamweaver or even frontpage.
_________________
[img:0a108d93e8]http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/9430/packagedeliverer54hy.gif[/img:0a108d93e8]
Back to top
 
LP-Harvey
Forum Moderator


Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 3283


PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm actually far more optimistic than Packagedelieverer, but I see where he's coming from. I don't mean to be cruel, but the tutorial is really poor.

BUT, I do like the actual software itself. The GUI does need improvement.

And there is one thing that I think is critical (but many may disagree), but missing. The ability to "snap to." Now I could have completely missed it, but I couldn't find a tool that would help you with alignment. Now it would be nice if you could "snap to an alignment," or at the least have guidelines. When trying to align text from one extreme to another (eg- top to bottom), its hard to get a feeling if your text (or graphics) is lined up properly.

This could turn out to be a really good product. I just feel that there could be a few things that could be more well refined.

As for PD's analogy to Pagebuilder, I think its pretty dead on.
Back to top
 
spock
iSpock


Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 2882
Location: The Netherlands

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LP-Knowledge Rocker wrote:
I personally don't like site builders because I prefer to use my knowledge to build a website, learning the coding and applying what I have learned.

Me too, but there are people that just want to build a simple website, and don't want to learn coding...

I tried the live demo, and I've got to say I'm quite impressed, although the whole feels a little bit slow in my opinion..

Other than that it looks great.. Looks like a nice product to me..
_________________
Spock's blog
My new site
My OpenTTD data package
Back to top
 
Leitzge
Grandmaster Poster


Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 275
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm agreeing with spock here. The demo could be hard for people to understand who don't speak English as their first language. Also, you should make the demo seem more professional. One example in particular is the typo, when you write 'thios' instead of this. Also, when you have multiple attempts at selecting all the text and getting rid of it. You should select it all at once (maybe have support for CTRL+A) and then simply press the backspace button. This is called marketing I guess, and you need to improve on it in order for this to become a success.
_________________
Philstar_8
Back to top
 
watsonalgas
Lifeless Person


Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1117


PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like Harvey said, I also thing there should be an alignment tool, maybe something as simple as a ruler, just to help keep things straight, which is sometimes hard to do just by looking at it. It's nice that you can place things wherever you want, but it would be even nicer if you could do that and be able to precisely align them also.

Another function that might ne nice would be an ""Undo." I know you can just re-open the file if you haven't saved the one you are working on yet, but that could get quite tiresome, as you would have to start all over again if you haven't been saving. Being able to undo things would make it a lot easier, I don't know how hard it would be to implement, but it seems like it would help a lot.

Other than, it seems like a pretty cool program.
Back to top
 
Logan
Mr. Grayscale


Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Posts: 2343
Location: Virginia

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't enjoy the use of website creators. It's a good way to start into the community, but after a while your mind should wake up and you should hand code websites. Also, have yet to see a a website creator program that spits out well made XHTML & CSS. All these programs make them in tables which in the new age computer world is stupid. And even if I did see that I still wouldn't use it. I believe that if you use these programs, you lose half the fun of it.

The program itself is nice and fluid, but I still don't like the idea.
_________________
[img]http://imgkit.com/Logan/beethoven-f.png[/img]
Logan Sucks.
Back to top
 
LP-Trel
Zen


Joined: 02 Dec 2002
Posts: 5730
Location: Nirvana by Boredom

PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Logan wrote:
I don't enjoy the use of website creators. It's a good way to start into the community, but after a while your mind should wake up and you should hand code websites. Also, have yet to see a a website creator program that spits out well made XHTML & CSS. All these programs make them in tables which in the new age computer world is stupid. And even if I did see that I still wouldn't use it. I believe that if you use these programs, you lose half the fun of it.

The program itself is nice and fluid, but I still don't like the idea.


Actually not all of these programs use tables. That is something to consider in itself. Smile

DDSC may use tables but, as I recall it uses CSS to position everything.
_________________
* Knowledge Base * Wiki * Forum FAQs *
Back to top
 
LP-Trel
Zen


Joined: 02 Dec 2002
Posts: 5730
Location: Nirvana by Boredom

PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good suggestions thus far. Smile

I'm sure Michael and the team will enjoy reading about your ideas.
_________________
* Knowledge Base * Wiki * Forum FAQs *
Back to top
 
identical
comet addict


Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 691
Location: 127.0.0.1

PostPosted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have just try this online site builder. To be honest, I have no experience with such a builder like this. I'm really please with this, as it loads fast in my dial-up connection.

The interface is good, too. It show me how good an AJAX application would be. Very Happy

However, as LP-Harvey said, it needs improving. Maybe the "snap to" feature would be default, and when you want "micro editing", there would be an option to enable it.

I would give it a try again when I have enough time. Silly
_________________
Love you, my little comet Rolling Eyes
Back to top
 
HeliosTech
Master Poster


Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 226


PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its a very complex software (I prefer like knowledge rocker to write html myself) I learned html at first in a basic web design class and then basically, by looking at source codes and stuff managed to teach myself the rest.
The site creator would be very good for beginners but the problem is, I am not a beginner and I had trouble trying to use it, maybe it's because I chose expert mode but I could not figure out how to change the template, or how to work most the stuff out properly.
For beginners people really like very simple things, like I remember homestead used to offer free hosting tools which were extremely easy to use (Picture of a counter - drag and drop to put onto your site)
It might make it somewhat simpler for the user if you created a client, so it did not run off of the web (things don't need to load or anything).
But other then those its a great, hope my input was helpful.
- Helios
_________________
[img:1741c9ca8d]http://www.helioslive.com/Helios%20Ad%20copy.jpg[/img:1741c9ca8d]
Back to top
 
clpo13
Zarkin' frood


Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Posts: 1210
Location: Washington

PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 11:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's definitely useful, not to mention quite amazing. When I first tried the demo, I was expecting the elements to snap into predetermined positions, yet I was able to position things almost anywhere. That, however, presented an interesting problem when trying to line certain elements up. If an option for snapping to adjacent elements is possible, I'd say go for it. If not, I'm sure people will adapt.

Myself, I prefer hand-coding, simply because I like to have more control over the way my site outputs. So in the past, I've shunned most site-builders. However, this drag and drop concept completely redefines site-building. No longer do people have to make do with preset text and graphic areas. They can simply put it where they want. I like it.

Good job!
_________________
"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." --Thomas Jefferson

[img:cd1c8454aa]http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y57/clpo13/anothersig1.jpg[/img:cd1c8454aa]
Back to top
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Lifelesspeople.com Forum Index -> Community Feedback, Suggestions, and Comments All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Home | Hosting | News | Forum | Links | System Status | About | Archive | Donate ]
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Posts and comments are owned by the poster. Everything else © 2001 - 2007 Lifelesspeople.com