Lifelesspeople.com

 Forum FAQsForum FAQs  Knowledge BaseKnowledge Base  RulesRules   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   HostingHosting   RegisterRegister 
 DonateDonate   WikiWiki   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

same sh*t, different day...
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Lifelesspeople.com Forum Index -> The World Around Us
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mellymoo
Lifeless Person


Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 554
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:23 pm    Post subject: same sh*t, different day... Reply with quote

http://news.sky.com/skynews/ar.....AB_CONTENT


surprised?
Back to top
 
marinaroz
Grey Scaled


Joined: 04 Mar 2004
Posts: 2765
Location: Israel

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Surprised? Can't say that I am. It's a sad world when such awful things no longer even surprise us.
_________________
Tarakana NET
Back to top
 
clpo13
Zarkin' frood


Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Posts: 1210
Location: Washington

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The title of the page doesn't match the content. "Two shot dead in US shopping mall" versus the nine deaths the story actually talks about.

I also think it's interesting that they bothered to mention that President Bush had visited just the area earlier that day. I doubt the two events were related, as this seems to be yet another poor sap who felt the need to go down in a blaze of faux glory.
_________________
"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." --Thomas Jefferson

[img:cd1c8454aa]http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y57/clpo13/anothersig1.jpg[/img:cd1c8454aa]
Back to top
 
mellymoo
Lifeless Person


Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 554
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

clpo13 wrote:
The title of the page doesn't match the content. "Two shot dead in US shopping mall" versus the nine deaths the story actually talks about.

.

I didn't even notice that - the first reports were probably for two dead, and it was up to nine by the time they finished writing.

and Marinaroz, you're right, i (perhaps shamefully) heave a sigh of boredom when news like this is the top billing on our reports over here - it seems to have come to be part of every day life in the USA, which is a very sad state of affairs. But, what to do eh? The country is already so gun-flooded, banning them (which would never happen anyway, school/street/mall shootings or not) wouldn't sort out the problem, especially if the perpetrator is out to take their own life at the end of it, what do they care about punishment???
Back to top
 
LP-Harvey
Forum Moderator


Joined: 23 Feb 2004
Posts: 3280


PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mellymoo wrote:
it seems to have come to be part of every day life in the USA, which is a very sad state of affairs


This is very true, but in general, Americans actually feel very safe.

The US is supposedly a big target for terror (and always has been since the 1970's), and yet things like Oklahoma City, 9/11, the first NY Trade Center Bombing, the Olympic Bombing, and other always shake the American psyche... but then it slowly fades away. Especially to people who take the view, "it happened over there, but not here."

People tend to forget, the US is such a big country that if an act of violence occurs in New York, the people of Los Angeles will say, "It's a shame... but it's so far away. What do I care?"

I don't think Americans are desensitized about violence in their country, but the thing is, the country is so big that when these things happen, it still feels like, "Well, it's not happening around here."

And then it suddenly happens in Small Town, USA, and everyone panics... except for the people in The Other Small Town, USA.
Back to top
 
blightyred
Savant Poster


Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 137


PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yet another example of the Paradox that is the U.S.A.

"Guns don't kill people, people kill people"


My question is this, if he 'wanted to go out in style', how much damage would he have done without the "constitiutionally allowed" weapons?

A person is smart, people are stupid.
Back to top
 
clpo13
Zarkin' frood


Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Posts: 1210
Location: Washington

PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

He would have been able to find weapons. It would have been a little bit harder, but if he really wanted to shoot someone, he could have found a way.

Besides, there are plenty of perfectly mundane objects that can be dangerous. Fertilizer bombs, anyone?
_________________
"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." --Thomas Jefferson

[img:cd1c8454aa]http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y57/clpo13/anothersig1.jpg[/img:cd1c8454aa]
Back to top
 
Necromis
Lifeless on my Boat


Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 739
Location: USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The one thing anti-gun people don't seem to get is if you outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns. If someone in the mall had a concealed weapons permit and was carrying a gun they potentially could have stopped the loss of life from being so high. It is a prove fact that in places where guns have been outlawed that violent crimes increase rather than decrease. Look at Washington DC for a perfect example of this. When the imposed gun control the crime rate went up by 300%. Criminals are not stupid. They don't want to be shot. If they think there is a gun in a home they go to another. When you remove that fear they can go into any home without worry of being shot.
Back to top
 
mellymoo
Lifeless Person


Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 554
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you're right necromis - gun culture in the USA will never be outlawed, but only because "they" messed up in the first place with the laws. If they hadn't been allowed from day one, then the country wouldn't be so saturated with them already and illegal arms would be easier to police.

No point shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted, as they say. So it looks like this IS something that American's will have to accept as part of everyday life, that can, and will happen anytime, anywhere.
Back to top
 
Stino
Savant Poster


Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 104
Location: Antwerp, Belgium

PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 4:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is a sad fact that things like these have become quite common these days. Society seems to become more violent every day and I am not sure if there is a way to stop that.

Maybe slightly off topic, but in the article they mention a person named Kevin Kleine, who is referred to as a woman. This is the first time that I hear about a woman named Kevin. Is it a common name for a woman?
Back to top
 
Kovacs
Pepe El Contratado


Joined: 12 Jun 2005
Posts: 1402
Location: Leeds, UK / Guardamar Del Segura, España / Cayey, Puerto Rico

PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stino wrote:
Maybe slightly off topic, but in the article they mention a person named Kevin Kleine, who is referred to as a woman. This is the first time that I hear about a woman named Kevin. Is it a common name for a woman?


Nope. That's another odd thing that Americans tend to do... give girls male names :S They call girls things like Jamie too. In UK these remain strictly male names, in my experience anyway.
_________________
I Love Rebecca More Than Anything In The World <3
Yo Amo A Rebecca Más Que Nada En El Mundo <3
Back to top
 
Necromis
Lifeless on my Boat


Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 739
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mellymoo, I don't think *they* messed up. The right to bare arms is to keep tyrants from taking over and ruling the country. After all if the colonists did not have that right we would still be under British rule here. You can prohibit guns from day one. You still won't change one thing. Criminals will ALWAYS have them. So you only harm the honest person who wants to protect themselves. Also back when the country was founded you NEEDED a gun. For food and protection against wild animals as well as hostil forces.
Back to top
 
DeadlyXScreams
Experienced Poster


Joined: 18 Feb 2007
Posts: 50
Location: United States, Texas

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LP-Harvey wrote:



People tend to forget, the US is such a big country that if an act of violence occurs in New York, the people of Los Angeles will say, "It's a shame... but it's so far away. What do I care?"

I don't think Americans are desensitized about violence in their country, but the thing is, the country is so big that when these things happen, it still feels like, "Well, it's not happening around here."

And then it suddenly happens in Small Town, USA, and everyone panics... except for the people in The Other Small Town, USA.


I don't understand what you mean by "It's so far away what do I care"

I'm from the U.S. and normally it depends on how extreme the happening is.

If it isn't extreme further states from where the problem is probably wouldn't hear about it. (Bordering states might)

For example:
A small convenience store robbery in michigan involving 1 death and 2 injuries people in Texas most likely wouldn't hear about it, as you said it is a big country but we do not say "That is so far away..." True, we probably wouldn't care as much as we should be we do always feel bad about the bad in our country and the world as most people would.

Now if it was something like a student walking into their school with as many weapons as he can carry shooting random people and killing/injuring many(Like what happened at virginia tech) Yes we would hear about it and we do care.

another example is hurricanes, schools all over the U.S. raise money to help rebuild what was destroyed.

I just wanted to make sure we know it isn't the matter of not caring it is the distance.



As for the weapons in our state Necromis is completely right. Silly
_________________
“When it hurts to look back, and you're scared to look ahead, you can look beside you and your best friend will be there.”

"People are like stained-glass windows. They sparkle and shine when the sun is out, but when the darkness sets in their true beauty is revealed only if there is a light from within."
Back to top
 
mellymoo
Lifeless Person


Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 554
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Necromis wrote:
mellymoo, I don't think *they* messed up. The right to bare arms is to keep tyrants from taking over and ruling the country. After all if the colonists did not have that right we would still be under British rule here. You can prohibit guns from day one. You still won't change one thing. Criminals will ALWAYS have them. So you only harm the honest person who wants to protect themselves. Also back when the country was founded you NEEDED a gun. For food and protection against wild animals as well as hostil forces.


so - other countries which have stricter gun control laws......they're just as bad for school/mall/street killings as the USA is? Didn't other countries need guns for food etc etc in the beginning? I'm sure they must have, so where did the USA go so wrong, when the rest of "us" seem to have got it right for the most part?

I agree with you on the "bing ruled by the British" thing though - I don't want that for us any longer either, but i'm not going to get me a gun and start shooting all the English! (believe it or not, there are a few of them i kinda like! lol )
Back to top
 
Pie32
Not Banned


Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Posts: 1411
Location: Lost in 84

PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kovacs wrote:
Stino wrote:
Maybe slightly off topic, but in the article they mention a person named Kevin Kleine, who is referred to as a woman. This is the first time that I hear about a woman named Kevin. Is it a common name for a woman?


Nope. That's another odd thing that Americans tend to do... give girls male names :S They call girls things like Jamie too. In UK these remain strictly male names, in my experience anyway.

Kevin isn't a girl's name in the US. There are a few names that for some reason can be given to both genders, like Kelly (though I think this one should only be a girl's name), Sam (the female version is short for Samantha while the male version is short for Samuel), Jamie, Eliot, and I'm sure there are a lot more (but not Kevin). It's not that girls are called by guys names, it's that people are retarded and think one genders name can apply to the opposite gender sometimes.


Quote:
One eyewitness said he saw officers arrest a man wearing camouflage who was hiding under a bus stop bench outside the mall.

I find this one to be pretty funny. I want to see a guy wearing camouflage trying to hide under a bench.
_________________
[img]http://luneknight.com.ru/counter.jpg[/img]
Random Battle: [img]http://luneknight.com.ru/l.jpg[/img] vs. [img]http://luneknight.com.ru/r.jpg[/img]
Back to top
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Lifelesspeople.com Forum Index -> The World Around Us All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Home | Hosting | News | Forum | Links | System Status | About | Archive | Donate ]
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Posts and comments are owned by the poster. Everything else © 2001 - 2007 Lifelesspeople.com