| Author |
Message |
skrelk Experienced Poster
Joined: 04 Feb 2007 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 9:43 am Post subject: Subcultures and Countercultures: My point of view |
|
|
Punk, skater, what are these? They are defined by all of us, and there is no one correct explanation of what they are. The only thing that we can say for sure about these is that they are "subcultures". Cultures that occur outside of mainstream society. Here's my take on it.
Punk: I'm a punk. Punk is a subculture that, at the moment is divided into many factions. You've got the fake punks, who don't understand any of the philosophies. Every faction is fighting against these. Then you have the corporate punks, who are more or less allied with the fake ones. The corporate punks what to be allied with various industries. Then you have the political punks, which is the faction I think I belong to. The political punks are strongly anti-fascist, and support freedom. Then you have general punk, which is strongly individualist and fighting the corporate and fake punks.
However, punk is constantly changing and more or less rebuilding after it's mysterious shrinking around 2001.
Skater: Except for the skater punks, who are just punks with skateboards, skater is a mess of corporation loving idiots who are often responsible for the commercialization of almost everything. They are fairly new, as for years skateboarding and punk were connected, until about 2001. Skater appears to have 3 factions. The corporation lovers. The group I would describe as free skaters. This faction has a strong belief in freedom, and is usually street skating. And then the punk skaters, which are punks with skateboards.
If this gets a good result, I'll maybe add some more. I find subcultures fascinating. _________________ hmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Xtreme Lifeless Person

Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 1325 Location: New Orleans, LA, USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Er. I'm curious as to what, precisely, you think defines "punk" in the first place. Because I'm not entirely sure that a "culture" or subculture (or what have you) should be defined by... skateboards?
I mean, maybe it's a valid hobby, but defining your beliefs, actions, and "subculture" on skateboarding?
Seems saturated with teenage angst and a generally confused world-view. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
skrelk Experienced Poster
Joined: 04 Feb 2007 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Er, is responding with an age-based/sanity questioning dismissal the best way to say you disagree? _________________ hmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
Xtreme Lifeless Person

Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Posts: 1325 Location: New Orleans, LA, USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry if I came off offensively as I did not, of course, intend to do so. However, I did intend, to some degree, to point out the apparent problems with this situation but mostly intended to find out, as I said before, what exactly you are calling "punk."
And, further, what is typical of a "punk" person and why those things are typical.
I think with a few things established on a concrete level we can begin to more accurately discuss the topic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
skrelk Experienced Poster
Joined: 04 Feb 2007 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The thing is, is that everyone will have a different opinion about the same subculture. _________________ hmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
spock iSpock

Joined: 23 Mar 2005 Posts: 2902 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't really get the point of subcultures anyway, I mean it's funny a group of people share the believe they should be individualistic. I mean isn't just believing something because you belong to a group the complete opposite to individualistic?
I mean, I like skateboarding, I like punk music (and about anything from just poppunk to hardcore punk). However that doesn't mean I need to be a part of any group.
I mean, I also like other things and other music. And that's why subcultures seem kinda pointless, that's just because everybody has different views. And that's also the reason everybody thinks differently about the meaning of specific subcultures. _________________ My new site
My OpenTTD data package |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
skrelk Experienced Poster
Joined: 04 Feb 2007 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, your making a very common mistake. Nonconformism doesn't mean bring in any group whatsoever, it means leaving mainstream society. Also, the beliefs are more than just the one you mentioned. Punks believe in true freedom, in tolerance, in standing up for what you believe... _________________ hmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
linuxdoctor Infallible Persona

Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 1247 Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
This thread is hilarious. I'm surprised that Xtreme was so easily cowed by shrelk when he was accused of ageism. Psuedo-socialist 'poltical' correctness in action. Xtreme should have retorted, "Don't confuse my experience as prejudice or your lack of it as wisdom."
Shrelk betrays his ignorance and arrogance in his use of words: 'subculture', 'anti-fascist', 'nonconformism' and 'freedom.' What is a subculture and does 'punk' and 'skater' qualify as such? These questions are not answered but are assumed to be true. What about 'nonconformism?' Is that a part of the 'punk' supposed subculture?
What of the word 'subculture' itself? Taken at its face, the word combines 'sub', meaning below, beneath, under, even inferior and 'culture' which meaning I will assume everybody knows. A subculture, then, is a part of a main culture but some subset of it. Nonconformism, which according to Shrelk means "leaving mainstream society" or culture, would seem to exclude any form of nonconformist philosophy or lifestyle as a subculture at all. If 'punk' is a form of nonconformity then it cannot be a subculture at all.
Indeed, my experience of self-proclaimed non-conformists, and Shrelk seems to be saying that 'punk' is non-conformist, is that they are not true non-conformists at all but merely conforming to something else, usually the tyranny of peer pressure, one of the curses of inexperience and young age. This begs the question, if 'punk' is a subculture, but is not a part of "mainstream society," then of what culture is 'punk' a part of?
Shrelk also used the word 'antifascist.' My experience of self proclaimed antifascists is that they do not know what fascism really is in the first place. Most confuse it with neo-Nazism, a false form of National Socialism, but fascism and Nazism have very little in common. This is not the place to discuss the differences between fascism and Nazism except to say that they are two radically different systems that really has only point in common, that being, they are both anti-democratic.
Fascism was best described by the person who invented the system and coined the word, Benito Mussolini, as "state corporatism." Anyone who says that government should be run like a business is a fascist. At it's heart is the corporatist philosophy, that is, the philosophy of Big Business. Those who support big business by working for them, buying their products or supporting their continued existence are corporatists and, by extension, fascists.
Anti-fascists I know all buy brand-name clothes and therefore are really crypto-fascists. Are you a crypto-fascist? Let's see? Do you buy brand name clothes? Do you drive a car and fill it with gas? Do you hang out in a shopping mall? Do you buy clothes, music, books and electronics in chain stores? Do you use Microsoft Windows instead of GNU/Linux or some other Free Software? If you answered 'yes' to any of these questions, then you too are a fascist or a collaborator. All of these things are made, sold and supported by Corporatist entities many of whom, like Microsoft, are criminal organisations also.
I get a laugh when so-called anti-fascist radicals are making up their fliers using Microsoft Word or giving presentations using Powerpoint. They are the lot brain-dead as far as I'm concerned.
And what about freedom? My experience is that those who tout the word 'freedom' most know the least about it. For many of them, freedom means being able to do whatever one likes, when one likes without the encumbrances of responsibility so long as nobody gets hurt. All one needs do is reflect only a little on this definition to realise that, if it were true, people would quickly end up with no freedom at all. The ancients, like Plato and Socrates, recognised this as a form a tyranny and not really freedom at all yet modern day proponents of "true freedom" blindly advocate its acceptance.
It is an unfortunate fact that experience takes time and wisdom does come with age. This is not always the case since I personally know some very stupid old people and a number of very wise young people, but that is not the norm and something that Shrelk will just have to live with. If Shrek really is interested in wisdom rather than conforming to his supposed subculture he'll need to first strike out on his own and seek it for himself and that usually means seeking out those who have gone before him. He will need to study the wisdom of the ancients like Plato and Socrates, great eastern philosophers like Confucius and the Buddha or mystics like St. John of Cross and great modern philosophers like Bertrand Russel. He will never find it by being a punk. _________________ Misanthrope: someone who realizes that humans really are as stupid as they appear.
If you think I'm 'politically' incorrect you have the wrong politics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
skrelk Experienced Poster
Joined: 04 Feb 2007 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, how I hate responding to mega-posts. My response will be in red.
| linuxdoctor wrote: | This thread is hilarious. I'm surprised that Xtreme was so easily cowed by shrelk when he was accused of ageism. Psuedo-socialist 'poltical' correctness in action. Xtreme should have retorted, "Don't confuse my experience as prejudice or your lack of it as wisdom."
Shrelk betrays his ignorance and arrogance in his use of words: 'subculture', 'anti-fascist', 'nonconformism' and 'freedom.' What is a subculture and does 'punk' and 'skater' qualify as such? These questions are not answered but are assumed to be true. What about 'nonconformism?' Is that a part of the 'punk' supposed subculture?
What of the word 'subculture' itself? Taken at its face, the word combines 'sub', meaning below, beneath, under, even inferior and 'culture' which meaning I will assume everybody knows. A subculture, then, is a part of a main culture but some subset of it. Nonconformism, which according to Shrelk means "leaving mainstream society" or culture, would seem to exclude any form of nonconformist philosophy or lifestyle as a subculture at all. If 'punk' is a form of nonconformity then it cannot be a subculture at all.
Subculture is generally understood to mean something different than the sum of it's parts. If you take the phrase subculture literally, then your correct. But the literal meaning is sometimes not the true one. If we also thought like this, we'd also be saying that one cannot rehearse, without hearsing first. [/red]
Indeed, my experience of self-proclaimed non-conformists, and Shrelk seems to be saying that 'punk' is non-conformist, is that they are not true non-conformists at all but merely conforming to something else, usually the tyranny of peer pressure, one of the curses of inexperience and young age. This begs the question, if 'punk' is a subculture, but is not a part of "mainstream society," then of what culture is 'punk' a part of?
[color=red] As I said, nonconformism is really just avoiding mainstream society. Even if you are conforming to something else, in this case punk, then you are still not conforming to mainstream society. Also, if this was peer pressure and such, I'd be calling my self a gangster, wouldn't I? And as I said, do not take the meaning of subculture literally. [/red]
Shrelk also used the word 'antifascist.' My experience of self proclaimed antifascists is that they do not know what fascism really is in the first place. Most confuse it with neo-Nazism, a false form of National Socialism, but fascism and Nazism have very little in common. This is not the place to discuss the differences between fascism and Nazism except to say that they are two radically different systems that really has only point in common, that being, they are both anti-democratic.
[color=red] I know what fascism is. Fascism is the philosophy that a government should have absolute power for the supposed good of all. It is often characterized by megacorporation control of many things.
Fascism was best described by the person who invented the system and coined the word, Benito Mussolini, as "state corporatism." Anyone who says that government should be run like a business is a fascist. At it's heart is the corporatist philosophy, that is, the philosophy of Big Business. Those who support big business by working for them, buying their products or supporting their continued existence are corporatists and, by extension, fascists.
I agree. [/red]
Anti-fascists I know all buy brand-name clothes and therefore are really crypto-fascists. Are you a crypto-fascist? Let's see? Do you buy brand name clothes? Do you drive a car and fill it with gas? Do you hang out in a shopping mall? Do you buy clothes, music, books and electronics in chain stores? Do you use Microsoft Windows instead of GNU/Linux or some other Free Software? If you answered 'yes' to any of these questions, then you too are a fascist or a collaborator. All of these things are made, sold and supported by Corporatist entities many of whom, like Microsoft, are criminal organisations also.
[color=red] I do do a few of the things. However, in this sick world we live in, it's virtually impossible to avoid these things. I am a realist as well as an anti-facist, and I have a firm belief that Barnes and Noble has no desire to rule the world. Just because it's a chain doesn't make it evil. As for the brand name clothes, I don't wear very much. I stopped purchasing them a while ago, and when I do wear them it's only because I'm waiting for it to become unusable. I am not purchasing new brand name clothes. Currently I'm wearing some brand-less black cargo pants, an plain black old shirt, and an anti-flag jacket. I don't drive, you can get very far on a skateboard.
I don't hang out at malls. I'm currently in the process of install Ubuntu.
I get a laugh when so-called anti-fascist radicals are making up their fliers using Microsoft Word or giving presentations using Powerpoint. They are the lot brain-dead as far as I'm concerned.
I have open office.
And what about freedom? My experience is that those who tout the word 'freedom' most know the least about it. For many of them, freedom means being able to do whatever one likes, when one likes without the encumbrances of responsibility so long as nobody gets hurt. All one needs do is reflect only a little on this definition to realise that, if it were true, people would quickly end up with no freedom at all. The ancients, like Plato and Socrates, recognised this as a form a tyranny and not really freedom at all yet modern day proponents of "true freedom" blindly advocate its acceptance.
Freedom is doing whatever you want, provided you don't hurt anyone who hasn't hurt you. I don't see any issue with that. We have responsibilty to ourselves, and no one else. Anything is control by the many over the few. And that is tyranny .
It is an unfortunate fact that experience takes time and wisdom does come with age. This is not always the case since I personally know some very stupid old people and a number of very wise young people, but that is not the norm and something that Shrelk will just have to live with. If Shrek really is interested in wisdom rather than conforming to his supposed subculture he'll need to first strike out on his own and seek it for himself and that usually means seeking out those who have gone before him. He will need to study the wisdom of the ancients like Plato and Socrates, great eastern philosophers like Confucius and the Buddha or mystics like St. John of Cross and great modern philosophers like Bertrand Russel. He will never find it by being a punk. |
Sometimes, in order to progress, a new view needs to be taken. There can be no progress without deviation from the celebrated ideas. You are little more than a pseudo-intellectual who feigns intelligence by using semantics, and talking about so-called great philosophers. I wonder if you would ever step out of your mainstream society, and live the counterculture for a day, a week, a month. I've seen mainstream society, and didn't like it. Perhaps you have the courage to step forward and look at the counterculture.
The biggest problem with your post is that it presented no counterarguments, or arguments. All it had were assertations, complaints and insults. This intriguing form of preventing effective counterarguments, by not presenting an argument in the first place is very calm on the internet.
I highly doubt you do. _________________ hmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
linuxdoctor Infallible Persona

Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 1247 Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
You need to do some radical editing on your response. It's just a mess as it stands. You got the 'quotes' and 'red' mostly in the wrong place. .
Here's something you said of some very little note.
| Shrelk wrote: | Sometimes, in order to progress, a new view needs to be taken. There can be no progress without deviation from the celebrated ideas. You are little more than a pseudo-intellectual who feigns intelligence by using semantics, and talking about so-called great philosophers. I wonder if you would ever step out of your mainstream society, and live the counterculture for a day, a week, a month. I've seen mainstream society, and didn't like it. Perhaps you have the courage to step forward and look at the counterculture.
|
This is nothing but pseudo-socialist political correctness. When one cannot address the issue by attacking the presenter; pseudo-intellectialism at its 'finest.' . If you wish to have a discussion, please address the issues.
And correct your post.
| Shrelk wrote: | | The biggest problem with your post is that it presented no counterarguments, or arguments. All it had were assertations, complaints and insults. This intriguing form of preventing effective counterarguments, by not presenting an argument in the first place is very calm on the internet. |
There was no argument to counter. You did precisely what you accused me of doing, that is, you merely made assertions and incorrect ones at that. I corrected them. If you wish to have a constructive argument then say something substantive and, at the very least, least get your definitions right. _________________ Misanthrope: someone who realizes that humans really are as stupid as they appear.
If you think I'm 'politically' incorrect you have the wrong politics.
Last edited by linuxdoctor on Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:40 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
skrelk Experienced Poster
Joined: 04 Feb 2007 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
I assure you, you can read it. Therefore, you have admitted your inability to produce any kind of counter argument, and so choose to attack grammar, BBCode us, the person, and semantics.
Step up, and respond to me. _________________ hmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
linuxdoctor Infallible Persona

Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 1247 Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| shrelk wrote: | | Step up, and respond to me. |
I responded to you by correcting your incorrect assertions. It is clear that you really don't have anything to say. If, however, on the off-hand chance that you do have a point to make, please make it and refrain from personal attacks. You won't get very far utilising pseudo-socialist 'political' correctness with me. _________________ Misanthrope: someone who realizes that humans really are as stupid as they appear.
If you think I'm 'politically' incorrect you have the wrong politics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
skrelk Experienced Poster
Joined: 04 Feb 2007 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
You edited your post after I told you to respond to me. It appears your hoping no one will notice you edited the post, and so will believe I ignored you responses. That will not be happening.
And now, for my responses.
| Quote: | This is nothing but pseudo-socialist political correctness. When one cannot address the issue attack the presenter; pseudo-intellectialism at its 'finest.' . If you wish to have a discussion, please adderss the issues.
And correct your post. |
Once again, an assertation without any evidence to support. It also mimics what I said. I cannot respond to something unless you say why it is that way.
| Quote: |
There was no argument to counter. You did precisely what you accused me of doing, that is, you merely made assertions and incorrect ones at that. I corrected them. If you wish to have a constructive argument then say something substantive and, at the very least, least get your definitions right. |
I was not in a debate when I made the post, I was presenting my opinions. When you respond, and open a debate you need to respond with evidence. I presented my evidence. _________________ hmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
linuxdoctor Infallible Persona

Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 1247 Location: Ottawa, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| skrelk wrote: | | You edited your post after I told you to respond to me. |
Told me? How impertinent. In any case, I noticed that you edited your post as well, not very well though.
| Shrelk wrote: |
It appears your hoping no one will notice you edited the post, and so will believe I ignored you responses. That will not be happening. |
So you are a mind reader too? This is what is known as an "unwarranted assumption" in logic.
| Shrelk wrote: |
And now, for my responses.
| linuxdoctor wrote: | This is nothing but pseudo-socialist political correctness. When one cannot address the issue attack the presenter; pseudo-intellectialism at its 'finest.' . If you wish to have a discussion, please adderss the issues.
And correct your post. |
Once again, an assertation without any evidence to support. It also mimics what I said. I cannot respond to something unless you say why it is that way. |
Your posts are all the evidence that is required to support my assertion. You are resorting to pseudo-socialist 'politically' correct brow beating; rather than making any coherent arguments. Further, you said nothing which merited a response other than to correct your rather obvious misperceptions. I corrected your incorrect assertions. No discussion on your part was necessary or warranted.
| Shrelk wrote: |
| linuxdoctor wrote: |
There was no argument to counter. You did precisely what you accused me of doing, that is, you merely made assertions and incorrect ones at that. I corrected them. If you wish to have a constructive argument then say something substantive and, at the very least, least get your definitions right. |
I was not in a debate when I made the post, I was presenting my opinions. When you respond, and open a debate you need to respond with evidence. I presented my evidence. |
We are not in a debate now. You did not state anything worthy of debate especially considering it is obvious you don't know what you are talking about. You are engaging in ad hominem attacks on me just as you had when you accused Xtreme of ageism. He, unfortunately and unwisely, capitulated to your bullying tactics something, you are discovering, does not work with me.
In fact, I was about to pass over your original post until I red your bullying and accusatory response to Xtreme's query. That is how the so-called 'politically' correct respond. Had you responded differently and more politely I probably would have passed over the thread as I had intended. You said nothing that interests me; your attitude, however, interests me immensely.
The only thing that is happening here is that I am getting PBPP points at your expense and that is well and good. Things have been slow around here recently and this post should be worth 45 points at least.
If you want an intelligent debate say something intelligent that is worthy of debate without engaging in pseudo-socialist 'politically' correct pseudo-intellectualism. So far you are not doing very well. _________________ Misanthrope: someone who realizes that humans really are as stupid as they appear.
If you think I'm 'politically' incorrect you have the wrong politics. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
skrelk Experienced Poster
Joined: 04 Feb 2007 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is it just me or are we going in circles? _________________ hmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
|
|