Lifelesspeople.com

 Forum FAQsForum FAQs  Knowledge BaseKnowledge Base  RulesRules   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   HostingHosting   RegisterRegister 
 DonateDonate   WikiWiki   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Subcultures and Countercultures: My point of view
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Lifelesspeople.com Forum Index -> The World Around Us
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Xtreme
Lifeless Person


Joined: 14 Aug 2004
Posts: 1326
Location: New Orleans, LA, USA

PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I appeared to shrink from any sort of debate, be assured that it is only because I was not aware that there was a debate. My "teenage angst" remark was more in reference to a certain attitude than an age group. In face, I myself am still 19 for a while. One can easily be between the ages of 12 and 20 while never drowning oneself in the aforementioned "teenage angst."

At any rate, my point still stands. There has been no clear definition of "punk" established, nor has there been any establishment of the defining behaviors, trends, or beliefs or a "punk" person. Therefore there cannot really be any intelligent or useful discussion and, as Linuxdoctor has said, there is no debate or argument. No point has been made over which a debate can be developed.
Back to top
 
skrelk
Experienced Poster


Joined: 04 Feb 2007
Posts: 42


PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Point: Linuxdoctor personal attacked me for no reason whatsoever.


Let's debate.
_________________
hmm
Back to top
 
marinaroz
Grey Scaled


Joined: 04 Mar 2004
Posts: 2836
Location: Israel

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

skrelk wrote:
Point: Linuxdoctor personal attacked me for no reason whatsoever.


Let's debate.


Linuxdoctor just has his particular way of arguing, don't take it personally. Also, you really should edit that post with the red - when you put your own response inside the quote marks, you don't get any points (PBPP) for it.
_________________
Tarakana NET
Back to top
 
linuxdoctor
Infallible Persona


Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 1258
Location: Ottawa, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did not attack Shrelk personally in the least. I responded to his false accusation of ageism against Xtreme in the way that pseudo-socialists do.

As for debating, Skrelk has to say something on which to base a debate. So far he has made only baseless assertions.

I did, however, take the time to visit Shrelk's website. Its content is equally as vacuous as his original post. Like his post, the content of his website only begs numerous questions rather than forming the basis for any kind of debate. I shall not, however, bring any of that material here except to mention its existence. It is up to him to introduce it for himself if he chooses. I only mention it because it demonstrates that he has no clear idea of what he really believes nor does he even seem to understand it.

If he truly wishes to understand them, then debating them is a good place to start. If he is serious, he will do the necessary research required in order to get a deeper understanding of the issues in order to support what he believes, or even to change his mind.

Now, Shrelk should not take these observations as a personal attack but at an opportunity at self examination and the examination of his peers. He certainly should not expect everybody to agree with him or his ideas, at the same time he should not consider people asking questions, as Xtreme had done, as an attack on them either.

And most importantly, Shrelk should not take himself, or anybody or anything else for that matter, so seriously. That is a mistake that seems to be endemic in youth. It is a useful flaw, however, one that has been used by leaders of every political stripe to seduce the young into doing stupid things since time immemorial.
_________________
Misanthrope: someone who realizes that humans really are as stupid as they appear.

If you think I'm 'politically' incorrect you have the wrong politics.
Back to top
 
skrelk
Experienced Poster


Joined: 04 Feb 2007
Posts: 42


PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your very arrogant, aren't you. Just look at how you talk/type with an air of superiority.


You are refusing to give any base for your statement that my website's content is vacuous. You also refused to say why, or give a base to the accusation that I do not know what I'm talking about.
_________________
hmm
Back to top
 
linuxdoctor
Infallible Persona


Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 1258
Location: Ottawa, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

skrelk wrote:
Your very arrogant, aren't you. Just look at how you talk/type with an air of superiority.


Yes, I am arrogant. It is one of the qualities of genius.

shrelk wrote:

You are refusing to give any base for your statement that my website's content is vacuous. You also refused to say why, or give a base to the accusation that I do not know what I'm talking about.


I stated exactly why.
linuxdoctor wrote:

Like his post, the content of his website only begs numerous questions rather than forming the basis for any kind of debate.
I further stated:
linuxdoctor wrote:
I shall not, however, bring any of that material here except to mention its existence. It is up to him to introduce it for himself if he chooses. I only mention it because it demonstrates that he has no clear idea of what he really believes nor does he even seem to understand it.


If you want to discuss that material it is up to you to bring it in provided that it is on-topic for this tread.
_________________
Misanthrope: someone who realizes that humans really are as stupid as they appear.

If you think I'm 'politically' incorrect you have the wrong politics.
Back to top
 
clpo13
Zarkin' frood


Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Posts: 1210
Location: Washington

PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey, hey, let's discuss the topic (countercultures and subcultures, in case anyone forgot) instead of other people. That way, no one can claim they're being attacked. After all, this isn't a "describe your opinions on the other person and their beliefs" debate...

Anyways, subcultures tend to confuse me. Perhaps it's because I'm part of what people call the "mainstream". I have a great many deeply held beliefs and a lot of them coincide with the beliefs of certain subcultures, but I don't feel the need to model my life around those beliefs through dressing and acting a certain way. My apologies if that sounds like I'm oversimplifying what a subculture is, but it's certainly the way it seems to someone uninvolved.

And yes, linuxdoctor can be arrogant. Try not to let that get in the way of proper debate. Arrogance != correctness.
_________________
"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." --Thomas Jefferson

[img:cd1c8454aa]http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y57/clpo13/anothersig1.jpg[/img:cd1c8454aa]
Back to top
 
skrelk
Experienced Poster


Joined: 04 Feb 2007
Posts: 42


PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why don't we do what he's suggested?
_________________
hmm
Back to top
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Lifelesspeople.com Forum Index -> The World Around Us All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Home | Hosting | News | Forum | Links | System Status | About | Archive | Donate ]
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Posts and comments are owned by the poster. Everything else © 2001 - 2007 Lifelesspeople.com