Lifelesspeople.com

 Forum FAQsForum FAQs  Knowledge BaseKnowledge Base  RulesRules   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   HostingHosting   RegisterRegister 
 DonateDonate   WikiWiki   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Taking God's Name In Vain?
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Lifelesspeople.com Forum Index -> Our Oratory
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Michael
Lifeless Person


Joined: 28 Feb 2005
Posts: 585


PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 9:46 pm    Post subject: Taking God's Name In Vain? Reply with quote

Is "gosh" not a substitue for the word "god"? When you say "Oh my gosh!", aren't you really saying, "Oh my God!" in an indirect way?

I was thinking back about a childrens sermon on the subject a while back and though it would be an interesting debate.
_________________
My Deviantart Profile
[img:c87bba34c1]http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/3543/psychoticredllppy9.jpg[/img:c87bba34c1]
Back to top
 
UnholyVashX
Master Poster


Joined: 17 Jan 2006
Posts: 151


PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That is true, and although personally I don't believe in God so I might be found doing it, but saying "holy cow" is a way to use someone elses god in vain. Although you might not think of that, it's just a new way to look at things... Razz
Back to top
 
WonkasWilly
Adept Poster


Joined: 15 Jan 2006
Posts: 71
Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't believe you are because they are different words, although one implies the other, I'm sure it's much better than being subtle about it.
Back to top
 
thunderboltz
Hear the thunder!


Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 1809


PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

'gosh' is a more lighter word. It is more of an exclamation. You do not think of God when you say that, do you?

People need to exclaim in order to release the adrenalin fueled excitement that builds up. And I personally think there is no problem with saying 'gosh'. After all, you aren't explicitly swearing.
_________________
LiVinG iN a DemOcraTicalLy eleCtEd CoMmunIsT stAtE
Back to top
 
MoUrNbLaDe
Ardent Poster


Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 80
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This seems to be a little bit of splitting hairs, but I think 'gosh' is perfectly acceptable, even though it may be a derivative of 'god'.

It's not the same word, so it should be fine, IMHO.
_________________
If you play a Windows CD backwards, you hear satanic messages. Even worse, when you play it forwards, it installs Windows.
Back to top
 
Magpie
Loud and Northern


Joined: 22 Apr 2005
Posts: 1141
Location: Yorkshire

PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 2:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They're just words. I use "God", "Jesus" and "Holy..." all the time.

If we're talking about modifiers such as "gosh" then could (and I'm spelling these phonetically) "jeez" or "gee" be derivatives of "Jesus"?
_________________
[img:72f68c01cd]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v225/YorkshireMag/newcastle_fc_fan.gif[/img:72f68c01cd]
Back to top
 
SoulJah
D!sCIpl3 0F C|-|2!5t


Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 1977
Location: In God's Majestic Kingdom

PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 4:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gosh isn't a bad word nor is it using God's name in vain. However, if you think about God when using that word then I would suggest to rethink how you use that. Sin is all in the mind, if your mind thinks it is wrong then most probably it is wrong.
_________________
Living by Faith

Romans 1:16- I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile

[img:bab3761c17]http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/9948/6011512295956ju.png[/img:bab3761c17]
[img:bab3761c17]http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/8500/archangelsig019kn.jpg[/img:bab3761c17]
Back to top
 
marinaroz
Grey Scaled


Joined: 04 Mar 2004
Posts: 2836
Location: Israel

PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 5:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't see what the big deal is about using God's name. It's my personal interpretation that "in vain" refers to using God's name when lying and telling untruths. I don't think God would mind being brought up in a general conversation.
_________________
Tarakana NET
Back to top
 
slsc
Gano Siempre!


Joined: 27 Jun 2003
Posts: 2604
Location: New Jersey

PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, "gosh" is a euphemism for "God" -- but "God" is not God's name (at least not in Christianity). If I remember correctly, the Israelites took the commandment not to take the God's (actual) name in vain that they very rarely spoke it, even in reverence to God, and in manuscripts wrote it without vowels.

Is saying "gosh" equivalent to saying God? Decide that for yourself. But saying "sex" is not equivalent to saying *that other word* (given, sex is not always used as a euphemism, but you get the idea).
_________________
- David
Back to top
 
thunderboltz
Hear the thunder!


Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 1809


PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LP-slsc wrote:
Yes, "gosh" is a euphemism for "God" -- but "God" is not God's name (at least not in Christianity). If I remember correctly, the Israelites took the commandment not to take the God's (actual) name in vain that they very rarely spoke it, even in reverence to God, and in manuscripts wrote it without vowels.


So are you telling, that saying 'Oh my God' is okay, as you are not saying 'Oh my Yehova', or however the tetragrammaton is supposed to pronounced?
_________________
LiVinG iN a DemOcraTicalLy eleCtEd CoMmunIsT stAtE
Back to top
 
slsc
Gano Siempre!


Joined: 27 Jun 2003
Posts: 2604
Location: New Jersey

PostPosted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 11:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thunderboltz wrote:
So are you telling, that saying 'Oh my God' is okay, as you are not saying 'Oh my Yehova', or however the tetragrammaton is supposed to pronounced?


That's between you and God. I've never done my own personal extensive study (I probably should) on this matter, so I can't offer a definitive answer with definite backup. But clearly God's name (YHWH in the Old Testament) is different from the word "God," which was Elohim.
_________________
- David
Back to top
 
golan_s
Fat Lifeless Person


Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Posts: 1272
Location: Israel

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am not sure if it's relevant to the discussion here, but "Elohim" (אלהים) is considered by religious Jews as one of God's (many) names and they avoid saying and even writing it. I have once heard a Rabbi explaining that "God", "Allah" and other translations of the Hebrew names of God to and from other languages must be avoided to.
Not sure if Christians are bothered that much by this issue, but it is a big concern for religious Jews.
_________________
ISA Proud
churcill wrote:
Democracy means that if the doorbell rings in the early hours, it is likely to be the milkman.
Back to top
 
slsc
Gano Siempre!


Joined: 27 Jun 2003
Posts: 2604
Location: New Jersey

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That is very relevant. How to apply it... I'll think of that when it's not 2am. [grins] Thanks for the insight.
_________________
- David
Back to top
 
Jeff's Mentor
Novice Poster


Joined: 19 Jan 2006
Posts: 2
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As you said, LP-slsc, it is kind of splitting hairs. It all depends on how serious one is about their religion. I have heard some preachers who claim that anything that even remotely suggests something sinful is evil (including christian alternative music and light swear words, like "gosh" or "darn").

Would one be offended if someone used the word "fudge" for the f-word, "beeyotch" for the b-word, or "shiznit" for the s-word? In some cases, the "light" words are very close to the "hardcore" words, and sometimes not, but it's all about context. "Gosh" sounds like someone drunk saying "God" or "God's", while "darn" is just substituting one letter to escape the technical word.
Back to top
 
marinaroz
Grey Scaled


Joined: 04 Mar 2004
Posts: 2836
Location: Israel

PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jeff's Mentor wrote:

Would one be offended if someone used the word "fudge" for the f-word, "beeyotch" for the b-word, or "shiznit" for the s-word? In some cases, the "light" words are very close to the "hardcore" words, and sometimes not, but it's all about context. "Gosh" sounds like someone drunk saying "God" or "God's", while "darn" is just substituting one letter to escape the technical word.


I think that it doesn't matter which word you use, but what intent is hidden behind the word. It works both ways too. Like, sometimes you can hear good buddies calling each other "dog" or "homo" or other things that are usually considered offensive, in a friendly manner. It's not offensive because the intent isn't there. Same with "beeyotch" or "effing", if the intent is there, it's offensive. I guess same could be applied to God.
_________________
Tarakana NET
Back to top
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Lifelesspeople.com Forum Index -> Our Oratory All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Home | Hosting | News | Forum | Links | System Status | About | Archive | Donate ]
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Posts and comments are owned by the poster. Everything else © 2001 - 2007 Lifelesspeople.com