US - the world watchdog, is it correct ?

rahulmalhotra

Every time there is a small incident that happens around the world, it seems that the US comes up with an opinion that seems to become policy and then acted upon.

Whether its Iran or for that matter Korea, the US president seems to be losing countless hours of sleep over non issues. Its like finding a needle in a haystack ( very difficult proposition ) then picking it out with an alliance of 50 countries, calling is a global peace initiative and then sitting on it. Lastly saying that it hurts without realising that they should have never picked the needle in the first place.

While there may be one opinion that says, who am I to interfere, I would like to say that

a) I never paid for fuel as much
b) I have never seen so much hatred
c) While people talk about moving forward, we seems to be moving back to the years of the crusades.

I would really love to know what you guys think
_________________
Reach out - "He who dares, Wins !"

[img:fae9d7cace]http://www.malhotra-online.com/Centaur.JPG[/img:fae9d7cace]

Eumel-at · Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:13 pm Post subject:

LP-SolidRaven · Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:23 pm Post subject:

Bush is the worst thing that has happened to the world after Hitler & Iran i gues. But thats not really the point here, or is it?

Bush is a fundamentalistic bitch in my opinion.
He says stuff like: "God Bless America"
Why is that bad:
-Not everybody even believes in religion
-Not everybody in the world believes in the same religion (if they believe a religion Neutral

)
-Dicators say such stuff to
-He is annoying everybody on the world with his endless patriotism, if the europeans wouldn't have gone to America in the first place it would propably still be filled with Native Americans (what wouldn't be so bad from some points of view)

And i can go on for a while bashing 'mr. bush'
_________________

bhrathairain · Ardent Poster Joined: 28 Aug 2005 Posts: 84

I think that until a country starts to directly threaten another country, it is not that other country's right to start "policing" the country's actions. So, essentially. as far as I think most of what the USA gets involved in is none of its business.

Eumel-at · Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 1:01 pm Post subject:

The_Michael · Master Poster Joined: 14 Feb 2006 Posts: 186

The Bush Administration is just as much a controversy even here in the United States. He was a topic of controversy even before his inauguration. Well fact is the United states is the world leader in political power. And well, fact is US policy is UN policy. And to be honest it has been that way for some time now. Many, many years, including the first Bush administration.

kenoodo · Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:33 am Post subject:

All I want to say is that you should make it clear first that who will benefit from that game.

As a leader of a country especially the strongest nation in the world militarily, Bush does a nice work. Am I right? Smile

Maybe.

To abstract the general public's attention from 911 and for business revival, it is a nice choice to go outside USA and, as you know, the chance came. He just did it and it did help.

I don't know how many he could get personally from these events, Bush will drop the reins of government and lose his power sometime, but his business won't stop.

And for "world policing" I afraid I can't agree with you. There are so many depressed area affairs that Bush and USA government has no interested in, like Shan in Burma.

The_Michael · Master Poster Joined: 14 Feb 2006 Posts: 186

kenoodo wrote:

Eumel-at · Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:13 am Post subject:

thunderboltz · Hear the thunder! Joined: 21 Apr 2005 Posts: 1809

America likes to poke its head into everything happening in the world. Its like the American politicians have some notion that they are of the upper crest or something. Rolling Eyes

The go about dictating how other countries should behave. They come to India and discuss the Kashmir issue - and dictate terms to us. Well, how would they feel us going to New Orleans and discussing their racism issues?

The American politicians are just large scale picturisation of the ignorance of the average American Joe. And such dirty politics they play too. Only last month, they threatened India telling that if they didn't vote in favor of the Iran resolution, and stop building the Iran-Pakistan-India oil-gas pipeline, then they'd withdraw all support to India in nuclear matters. What right do they have to question the independent stand of India? And in the end of it all, a shameless apology by the one and only Mr. Bush. Mad

Almost every American I've met hates him. They why did you elect him to the post in the first place? Confused

_________________
LiVinG iN a DemOcraTicalLy eleCtEd CoMmunIsT stAtE

kazunoben · Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:32 am Post subject:

LP-SolidRaven · Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:26 pm Post subject:

The_Michael · Master Poster Joined: 14 Feb 2006 Posts: 186

well the purpose Bush started the war was partly for Oil, I agree, but it wasnt for personal reasons I don't believe.
religious war? Jihad? surely not, that would be to say that the united states was trying to be a modern day Nazi war machine. I really don't think thats the case
America does indeed like to poke its head into every nook and cranny in the world , well except for china, but then again , china could stomp us in the ground with their army just as well to face the facts there.
Eh Over All I think the war on Iraq was a good move , Hussain was a problem in the world a larger one than most would admit to be honest.
It was also a message to maybe even Alqueda that we could pull such an attack off.

LP-SolidRaven · Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:28 pm Post subject:

golan_s · Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:18 pm Post subject:

	Lifelesspeople.com Forum Index -> The World Around Us	All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page 1, 2, 3 Next
Page 1 of 3