Lifelesspeople.com

 Forum FAQsForum FAQs  KnowledgebaseKnowledgebase  RulesRules   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   HostingHosting   RegisterRegister 
 DonateDonate   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Windows 7  Share
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Lifelesspeople.com Forum Index -> Techy Turf
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
spock
Lifeless Person


Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 3133
Location: The Netherlands

PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LP-SolidRaven wrote:

Quote:
i never had a problem with Vista, but 7 beta 1, seems to be much faster than visa, and certainly much faster than the pre beta builds. i'm loving it.

That's only cause microsoft said it would be faster. Go and time it, you won't see that much of a difference.

Well, I tested it, and it outperforms Vista on my computers. However, XP is still faster. But, since Windows 7 is still in beta that might improve. As it is now, I won't be upgrading windows XP on my Windows workstations. But I feel it's definitely better than Vista.

LP-SolidRaven wrote:

Quote:
I think alot of others will as well... well the open non biased people Wink

Who are you calling biased. You're bound on always ignoring every valid point we say and you keep repeating yourself without ever stating any source.

And I agree with that. The Grinch might be the most biased person in existance.
_________________
My new site
Back to top
 
ClickFanatic
Est. 2005


Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 4685
Location: 37°45'18.24"N 14°59'42.9"E

PostPosted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Please, people, for the sake of conversation, don't start becoming personal again.
You can be biased all you want, at least it is better than flaming eachother. Remember, it's just software.
_________________
If you can read this, my post is on an alternating background.
Back to top
 
Xtreme $niper
Lifeless Person


Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1870
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't plan on testing Windows 7. For the first time in a long time (since Whistler) I have no interest in testing a new operating system. I just know what to expect, and as a Mac user I have no need to bother with Windows any longer until it becomes used in corporate environments.

But as a side note, I think The Grinch really needs to stop assuming that if something is not working for someone, then their hardware is obsolete. Neither Vista nor Windows 7 is perfect, and there is no real excuse for either operating system to not be able to work with his hardware. Instead of calling him biased or just bashing everything he says in general, you could try to help solve his problems if you actually cared about showing people how Windows is still relevant in today's world.
_________________
Come visit Shattered Abstracts! (Photoblog!)
Back to top
 
krt
...


Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 4995
Location: Down Under

PostPosted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Grinch wrote:
i never had a problem with Vista, but 7 beta 1, seems to be much faster than visa, and certainly much faster than the pre beta builds. i'm loving it.

So despite running on just about the same kernel and Windows 7 being in beta, it is still much faster than Vista? I didn't notice a difference (1%-10% improvement maybe?) but I think you are showing how bad Vista is. Either that or your Vista install has suffered some Windows cruft and Windows 7 therefore appears to be going significantly faster.
_________________
AU Proud
Back to top
 
The Grinch
Lifeless Person


Joined: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 6385
Location: Chuck Norris's nightmares.

PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 1:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

krt wrote:
The Grinch wrote:
i never had a problem with Vista, but 7 beta 1, seems to be much faster than visa, and certainly much faster than the pre beta builds. i'm loving it.

So despite running on just about the same kernel and Windows 7 being in beta, it is still much faster than Vista? I didn't notice a difference (1%-10% improvement maybe?) but I think you are showing how bad Vista is. Either that or your Vista install has suffered some Windows cruft and Windows 7 therefore appears to be going significantly faster.

Or not?

meh. i kinda give up with you guys. Have fun dismissing windows amongst yourselves. should be fun.

Enjoy laying in your ****.
_________________

http://www.MJGZ.com
Back to top
 
krt
...


Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 4995
Location: Down Under

PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're not "kinda giving up" because you are yet to provide enough substance in a post to formulate something that passes as an argument.

And you're assuming we are laying in whatever. You actually are and you've demonstrated it. Vista apparently sucks that bad for you that you are willing to use Microsoft beta software which has resulted in an irreparably broken music library and who knows what else.
_________________
AU Proud
Back to top
 
Xtreme $niper
Lifeless Person


Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1870
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, I wouldn't exactly assume that he tried the Windows 7 beta because Vista sucks. It's more likely to be pure curiosity, which was the same thing that drove me to try out the Whistler and Longhorn betas even though my main OS at the time was fine.
_________________
Come visit Shattered Abstracts! (Photoblog!)
Back to top
 
mcwkm
Lifeless Person


Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 748
Location: ct

PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the one longhorn beta I had tried was absolutely worthless. I have used Vista and they were nothing alike. The longhorn release that I was introduced to was because it was a computer repair class and the as students we were trained to fix microsoft based systems in the class. My longhorn experience gave me no help when I looked at Vista. I wonder how much of 7 beta will be the same in the actual release or completely different.
Back to top
 
LP-SolidRaven
Evil Belgian Waffle


Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 8144
Location: Belgium

PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 1:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Longhorn was actually quite good compared to vista...
_________________
Dilly dally, shilly shally.
Back to top
 
Xtreme $niper
Lifeless Person


Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1870
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Longhorn went through a looong beta cycle that changed numerous times pretty dramatically throughout the process, so I can definitely see why maybe that one beta build you tried was horrible.. But it wasn't all that bad.
_________________
Come visit Shattered Abstracts! (Photoblog!)
Back to top
 
ClickFanatic
Est. 2005


Joined: 18 Jan 2005
Posts: 4685
Location: 37°45'18.24"N 14°59'42.9"E

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Xtreme $niper wrote:
Longhorn went through a looong beta cycle that changed numerous times pretty dramatically throughout the process, so I can definitely see why maybe that one beta build you tried was horrible.. But it wasn't all that bad.

It ended up pretty bad, though. Mr. Green
_________________
If you can read this, my post is on an alternating background.
Back to top
 
mcwkm
Lifeless Person


Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 748
Location: ct

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Xtreme $niper wrote:
Longhorn went through a looong beta cycle that changed numerous times pretty dramatically throughout the process, so I can definitely see why maybe that one beta build you tried was horrible.. But it wasn't all that bad.

I didn't mean the beta build I tried was bad but it certainly gave me no help in preparing me for what became windows vista. Basically everything had changed and I might as well just have not looked at it to give me an idea for the switch
Back to top
 
Xtreme $niper
Lifeless Person


Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 1870
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mcwkm wrote:
Xtreme $niper wrote:
Longhorn went through a looong beta cycle that changed numerous times pretty dramatically throughout the process, so I can definitely see why maybe that one beta build you tried was horrible.. But it wasn't all that bad.

I didn't mean the beta build I tried was bad but it certainly gave me no help in preparing me for what became windows vista. Basically everything had changed and I might as well just have not looked at it to give me an idea for the switch


Well yeah in that case then I have no idea what happened with the beta builds at the last second. It started off looking like XP, then they went through numerous theme changes, and then all of a sudden they released the final version even though it wasn't really properly given time to go through the beta cycle.

I think they didn't handle the beta situation for Vista too well.
_________________
Come visit Shattered Abstracts! (Photoblog!)
Back to top
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Lifelesspeople.com Forum Index -> Techy Turf All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Home | Hosting | News | Forum | Links | System Status | About | Archive | Donate ]
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Posts and comments are owned by the poster. Everything else © 2001 - 2007 Lifelesspeople.com